Welcome to the Blogcast Repository Sign in | Join | Help
Search BlogCastRepository.com for:
in Search

245 BlogCasts in The BlogCast Repository!

Matt Broadstock

Check us out!
SMS Utilities

More on blog etiquette

I ran across a nice forum/article on the art of plagiarism in blogging. I *hate* copy/paste blogs. I don't even mind if people have large contents of material pasted in their blog as long as they at least have some useful comments to make on the subject matter.  There may not be a lot of us blogging on this site yet, but I'm always impressed by the content and the way it is presented. I've given up on a lot of other site feeds because I got sick of scrolling through all of the junk to get to the useful posts.

Here is the link to the forum posts: http://slashdot.org/articles/06/05/22/1726224.shtml

Here is the article (it is pretty short actually): http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238

http://72.14.203.104/search?sourceid=navclient-menuext&ie=UTF-8&q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.plagiarismtoday.com%2F%3Fp%3D238 (google's cached version because I couldn't get the webpage to come up)

Here's a post from the forums by Opportunist that sums up my feelings fairly well (and yes, I realize I am just copy/pasting it :)  But most of my posts are original or just hyperlinks with summaries so I suppose I'll let myself get away with being a little hypocritical on this one.):

Nobody can read the whole internet. Nobody. So what people do is they rely on others to pick the interesting pieces worth reading and go from there.

But there are 2 ways to do it: Summing up the content and providing a link, or ripping a few lines out of context and then mentioning in the fine print where they're from.

While the first is something I do agree with, the second stinks of "I don't have content but I want visitors, but if I hand out my sources my visitors might go there instead of to me."

So while I'm all for gathering info and making it available to your readers, I'm also very much against the "Readers Digest" approach: Snipping out what I deem valuable, copying it to my page and giving half-hearted credit to the real author. Linking is cool. Copy-paste-blogging is just lame.

And I'd really wish this message could be sent to those who do it just that way.

Share this post:                                       
Published May 22 2006, 05:43 PM by Matt Broadstock
Filed under:

Comments

 

Brian S. Tucker said:

HEH! I know your point Matt... SOME people even become MVP's because of it....
May 22, 2006 8:23 PM
 

Dan Thomson said:

Well, I was just thinking about this topic this evening as I was checking out the various sites I visit on a regular basis. During my visits, I came across quite a few link drops. I have to admit that I too don't much care for the link drops, even if they point back to my own blog posts.

I know I've been pretty close to posting a few link drops myself, but I at least try to provide a bit of information regarding the content in the linked page.

On a positive side: One thing I keep in mind regarding such posts is that it's a positive thing to share information, link drop or not, versus not sharing anything at all.

Let's hope things improve.
May 22, 2006 8:58 PM
 

Matt Broadstock said:

You are 100% right Dan. I always like the fact that people are trying to share knowledge. I just wish there was more courtesy/common sense. And none of us always have to time to write tons of comments on something that we find interesting and want to share. But some blogs don't *ever* have any commentary.  I liked what the article said about people trying to keep a certain percentage of content original.

And honestly, I don't really mind if a blog is mostly links--they don't take up much space and I can choose whether it sounds interesting or not. It is the copy/paste posts that bug me. They just make my RSS reading an annoying session of working out my mouse's scroll wheel.
May 23, 2006 2:16 PM
 

Dan Thomson said:

I catch ya now Matt. We are inline with that as well.
May 23, 2006 5:03 PM